Short memory

I know there’s other, bigger, more topical things going on right now, but I couldn’t let this little gem of self-aggrandising historical revisionism from Clare Short slip past. Speaking to the Guardian about how Gordon Brown will be remembered, she says:

On Iraq he was marginalised by Blair for most of the time, but if he had moved with Robin [Cook] and me, we could have stopped it. But he didn’t move. I just think the young Brown wouldn’t have believed what he ended up doing.

That’s funny, I was sure I recalled Clare Short also not moving with Robin Cook, supporting the war at a crucial time when her resignation could have helped prevent it, and only quitting two months later when it was too late and the invasion was done, because people weren’t treating her as a Big Important Person like they did when they wanted her vote.

posted on May 11, 2010 at 10:00 pm in History, Politics

Indecision time

Protest or Forget

So here we are. Bloody again.

I’ve voted in every single election I’ve been able to in my adult life; every local, mayoral, national and European election for over a decade. Of those many, many elections, I think I’ve been able to cast a willing and meaningful vote – voting for someone I truly wanted to win, in an election where my vote stood a chance of making a difference – three times. The rest of the time, either the fear of a Tory victory has sent me reluctantly trudging back to a Labour party I’ve spent a decade trying, and mostly failing, to believe in; or, being in a seat with no chance of changing hands, I’ve switched to the Lib Dems or Greens in an attempt to “send a message” to Labour. A message that’s had all the effectiveness of tattooing a manifesto on the inside of your own eyelids.

Given that I was utterly dreading the grim death march this election promised to be – to the extent that for the sake of my sanity I considered simply deciding that any time anyone talked about the election, I would assume they were talking about the upcoming presidential elections in the Philippines, and ignore it – I was caught unexpectedly on the hop by the fact that I actually found myself being tentatively drawn into the whirling vortex of Cleggmania that ensued (and also, perhaps even more so, to the accompanying Dr Evan Harris Love-In that broke out across large sections of the geekosphere.)

I’m by no means blind to the Lib Dems’ flaws. I worked in Parliament for a Lib Dem MP for the best part of a year (while never being a member of the party, and indeed having a thoroughly good time trying to scare the locals by playing the bolshy socialist). So I have both a natural residual affection for the party, but also an awareness that the party can be an ideologically unstable mixture of cuddly, progressive centre-left types mixed in with a fair number of people who can best be described as “Tories who weren’t big enough bastards”. (See the Lord Clement-Jones led cock-up over the web blocking amendment to the Digital Economy Bill in the Lords for a real-life example of this tension at play.)

I also don’t deny that the Liberal Democrats suffer from a lack of what football pundits tediously refer to as “strength in depth”. They’ve got a decent first team, but when you look at the subs’ bench you start noticing that it’s packed with teenagers and players you thought were actually dead. They undeniably have their fair share of (to use Caitlin Moran’s excellent phrase) “the Curly Wurly thinkers”. But when you consider that Labour found a steady stream of senior positions for Geoff Hoon – a man with the character traits and skill set of a vindictive marshmallow – while the Conservative shadow cabinet boasts such reliable tits as Chris Grayling and Jeremy Hunt, it’s not like any party really wants to go round swinging their “look at what a deep pool of talent we’ve got” dick.

So yes. I worry about the Orange Book tendency of the Lib Dems, and Nick Clegg’s part in it. I worry that they’ll not have the strategic nous to navigate a hung parliament without giving the Tories everything on a plate. I worry that a lot of previously ignored Lib Dem MPs will suddenly find themselves being taken out to some very nice restaurants by some very nice lobbyists who have very plausible-sounding cases to put forward, and – being human – will get suckered in. And yes, I worry that Chris Huhne and David Laws might actually be aliens.

But I like the idea of there being a genuine third force in British politics. I like the idea of a parliament where politicians actually have to talk to each other, rather than just jeer across the aisles. I like the idea that regardless of the situation in my constituency, my vote will have meaning on a national scale as a clear signal that we need a fairer voting system. I like the idea of a party that opposes renewing Trident, that wants fairer taxes, that adopts a realistic and compassionate approach to immigration, that is full-throated in its defence of science and evidence-based policy, that doesn’t support illegal wars, that backs repealing the Digital Economy Act, that is in favour of European integration, that opposes ID cards and supports civil liberties, and that – yes – demands urgent electoral reform, and I’m frankly baffled that it’s not the Labour party I’m talking about there. I think a Prime Minister who speaks fluent Dutch would be pretty neat.

In terms of a Venn diagram charting the extent to which I agree with Nick, this:

Nick Clegg Agreement Diagram

And yet, here I am, writing this post at stupid o’clock on the morning of the election, and I still don’t know who I’m going to vote for. That’s because my constituency of Poplar & Limehouse is a Labour-held Tory target, and a combination of boundary changes and demographic shifts over the past five years – plus a dash of the inevitable George Galloway sideshow – have put the seat firmly in play. I look at my MP’s voting record, and it reads like a greatest hits setlist of New Labour’s biggest fuckups. I desperately don’t want yet another five years where Labour can abandon principle after principle, safe in the knowledge that no matter what, the prospect of something worse will always send me scurrying back. And yet, as the polls swing rightwards in the last few days, every other consideration starts to become dwarfed by that tiny, nagging possibility that it’ll be my one crucial vote that gives the Tories that one crucial seat, and…

It’s become a tired, arrogant tactic, Labour using the Tory bogeyman to scare us into excusing their failures. But I’m still checking under my bed to see if George Osborne’s hiding there.

So, I still don’t know how I’m going to vote today. But I strongly suspect that regardless, once the counting’s done, and the tears, beer and ink stains have all been wiped clean, my first action will be to send some money the way of the Electoral Reform Society. Because, quite frankly, I don’t ever want to have to go through this bullshit again.

posted on May 6, 2010 at 6:00 am in Politics

OH NOES

The only reasonable response to the BNP membership list leak: a LOLcats v Neo-Nazis image macro clash. In other words, LOLGriffin.

LOLGriffin

posted on November 19, 2008 at 9:16 pm in Pictures, Politics

More shoes

The only sensible comment of the whole financial malarkey comes from 2004, by briefly shiny pop duo Johnny Boy (which I also posted in this) – and their single You Are The Generation That Bought More Shoes And You Get What You Deserve:

I’m actually about to buy another pair of shoes online right now, in case anybody should think about absolving me of my hypocrisy.

posted on September 29, 2008 at 8:50 pm in Music, Politics, Video

Studies in not knowing what the fuck you’re talking about

Compare and contrast:

and

My vote’s going to the dude pretending to be a dude confused for another dude.

posted on September 25, 2008 at 3:04 am in News, Politics, Video

Open Tech 2008 – a quick and unhelpful summary

As Chris has already written about, Saturday saw the return of Open Tech, the British geek conference, after an absence of three years. I went along, hungover like a bastard, and a good time was had by all.

Some quick highlights:

Danny O’Brien (excellent as always) somehow turning the Open Rights Group talk into a revivalist meeting, as Bill Thompson led a movement of those not yet saved to come forward and be baptised (and hand over a tenner). Also, the first half of the talk was conducted entirely in Foundation references, the second half entirely in Doctor Who references. It was all very enjoyable, and a delight to see how well the completely spontaneous idea (ahem) that Open Tech 2005 came up with has progressed. If you care about any of the issues ORG fights on – privacy, e-Voting, freedom of information, copyright reform, and host of others – you should probably go and join them now.

The MySociety guys giving the lowdown on WhatDoTheyKnow?, another great, simple political application that makes submitting FoI requests easy, and automatically publishes any response. It’s a great site, and along with all the other MySociety stuff (the video on TheyWorkForYou, the travel time maps) gives you hope that maybe this world isn’t entirely doomed after all.

The same goes for the guys behind the Power Of Information project, who are actually doing cool things within government to free up data and give it to people to use – it’ll be fascinating to see how ShowUsABetterWay works out, because it’s a potentially brilliant scheme.

The guys from guardian.co.uk, who explained the thinking behind the architecture for the Guardian’s web refit. I’ll not go into detail right now (it’s too late to try channeling Martin Belam) but I was pleased in an entirely egotistical way that a lot of their thoughts were similar to thoughts I’d had. Hurrah. They, of course, have the advantage of actually having done them, rather than just vaguely thinking about them.

Overall, there wasn’t quite the same sense of excitement as there was at previous iterations of the event – no “wow” factor stuff like TheyWorkForYou being unveiled, or Audioscrobbler being explained and me totally failing to get it, and a lot less of the useless-but-fun tech hacking that it had in its NotCon days – but instead there was a sense that things were maturing and actually getting stuff done. Which is good, I think,

People I saw but didn’t have anything sufficiently interesting to say to that would have justified me talking to them: Ben Goldacre, Danny O’Brien, Toms Steinberg and Loosemore, Simon Willison, Rufus Pollack and an awful lot of familiar faces whose names I couldn’t quite place. People I was going to talk to but then couldn’t find: Becky Hogge, who now runs ORG and I went to university with. People who I realise I never actually introduced myself to although I was technically in a conversation with even though I wasn’t saying much: Tom Reynolds. Puzzling conversations about Charlie Stross books with someone who clearly thought I was someone else: 1.

posted on July 7, 2008 at 11:22 pm in Politics, Sci/Tech, Web

Fuck

Fuck.

posted on May 3, 2008 at 1:26 am in Grumpy, Politics, Sad

Screen burns

Iraq just offers more of the same: death after death after death after death, until each death becomes nothing more than a dull pulse on a soundtrack; the throb of a neighbour’s washing machine we learned to filter out months ago; the invisible ticking of a household clock. We’ll notice if it stops, but not before…

…Particularly striking is the figure regarding the total number of Iraqi dead – striking because it’s so huge, and so vague. It lies somewhere between 150,000 and 1 million.

Between 150,000 and a million. That leaves 850,000 people who may be dead or alive. We simply don’t know. They currently exist, or do not exist, within a cavernous margin of error. Our minds can’t process this degree of horror. No wonder we change the channel. No wonder nothing feels real.

Charlie Brooker is also good when he’s not being funny.

posted on March 17, 2008 at 10:06 pm in Politics, TV, Writing

Little cat’s feet

Briefly to note, in a stream of cultural consciousness: A few days ago, I wasn’t even aware of the existence of the long-running American political debate show The McLaughlin Group. Then Rex Sorgatz at Fimoculous wrote this post about this Esquire article about how it was actually excellent and not rubbish like all the others, which sort of piqued my interest. Now, a few days later, my absolute new favourite blog, clapclap, which I only found today via this MeFi thread about the Jeff Buckley essay which is currently in my linklog, wrote this post about a challenge that Fluxblog set hard-partying rocker Andrew W.K. – who I hadn’t heard anything about for about five years – which was to record a song based around this wildly bizarre bit of conversation from The McLaughlin Group, something which I might not have checked out of I hadn’t already had my interest prompted by the previous piece and blah blah blah.

All of which is merely a bit of context-setting build up so that hopefully, when I tell you to download this mp3 of Andrew W.K. singing a 47-second long song based on the transcript of a political debate show because it is BASICALLY GREAT, you won’t think I’m completely mad.

posted on March 7, 2008 at 1:07 am in Music, Politics

Who benefits?

I’ll leave it to other, wiser heads to debate the serious ramifications of the hilarious “all your data are in the post” cock-up by BRMC HMRC that was revealed today. What I want to know is – how on earth did the Open Rights Group manage to arrange for this news to break on the day that they launched their big fundraising drive?

Good work, Becky, Michael, Suw, Danny, et al! But, um… could you give back the disks with everybody’s bank details on now, please?

posted on November 21, 2007 at 2:48 am in News, Politics

Ways to enthuse British people about the prospect of staying in Iraq for decades, #437:

“It’s just like Northern Ireland!”

posted on July 9, 2007 at 8:31 pm in News, Politics, Stupid

The new terror

Nearly two years ago, in response to the traumatic non-events of July 21st, I created this new version of the terror alert scale, to better reflect the nature of the threat we faced:

Old revised terror scale

Now, as the country reels in shock from the recent incidents in London and Glasgow, I feel it is my civic duty to replenish the scale anew, once again so that it can fully encompass the sheer level of horror that confronts us. Remember – we are at war with people who hate our way of life. And by “way of life”, I mean they hate the fact that we can tie up our own shoelaces without assistance.

New revised terror scale

posted on July 1, 2007 at 2:39 am in News, Pictures, Politics

Next »